ЧТО СПОСОБСТВУЕТ УЧАСТИЮ ПОСТАВЩИКОВ В ГОСЗАКУПКАХ ИННОВАЦИОННОЙ ПРОДУКЦИИ В РОССИИ? РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ЭМПИРИЧЕСКОГО ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ
Аннотация
Статья посвящена оценке стимулирующих и сдерживающих факторов активности участия поставщиков в государственных закупках инновационной продукции в России. В первом квартале 2025 г. был проведен масштабный онлайн-опрос с охватом более 1 200 респондентов. Результаты показали, что основными стимулами для поставщиков при участии в закупках инновационной продукции являются внутриорганизационные стимулы, а также уменьшение бюрократических процедур и административных барьеров, разработка законодательных преференций для поставщиков. Среди значимых барьеров респонденты отмечают ограниченность внутренних ресурсов, опасения нарушить закупочное законодательство при участии в закупках, а также репутационные риски в случае невозможности исполнить контракт.
Результаты исследования свидетельствуют о том, что для участия в закупках инновационной продукции важен положительный предыдущий опыт поставок этой продукции, а также сокращение бюрократических процедур и информирование о возможностях участия в госзакупках. Делается вывод о необходимости унификации понятийного аппарата в области закупок инновационной продукции и разработки методических рекомендаций для участников рынка, что, по мнению авторов статьи, будет способствовать увеличению масштаба и объемов закупок инновационной продукции в России.
Скачивания
Литература
Cabral, L., Cozzi, G., Denicolò, V., Spagnolo, G., and Zanza, M. (2006) Procuring innovation. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5774. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=932112 (accessed 17 September 2025).
Calzolari, G., and Spagnolo, G. (2009) Relational contracts and competitive screening. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7434. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1484466 (accessed 17 September 2025).
Chiappinelli, O., Giuffrida, L.M., and Spagnolo, G. (2025) ‘Public procurement as an innovation policy: Where do we stand?’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, (100), 103157.
Doroshenko, M., Miles, I., and Vinogradov, D. (2014) ‘Knowledge intensive business services: the Russian experience’, Foresight and STI Governance, (8), pp. 24–38.
Edler, J. (2016) Local Needs, Global Challenges: The Meaning of Demand-Side Policies for Innovation. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2016-chapter5.pdf. (accessed 17 September 2025).
Edler, J. and Yeow, J. (2016) ‘Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation’, Research Policy, 45(2), pp. 414–426.
Edquist, C. (Eds.) (2015) Public Procurement for Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Erridge, A., and Greer, J. (2002) ‘Partnerships and public procurement: building social capital through supply relations’, Public Administration, 80 (3), pp. 503–522.
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., and Laranja, M. (2011) ‘Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation’, Research policy, 40 (5), pp. 702–713.
Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) ‘The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations’, Research Policy, 29(2), pp. 109–123.
Gerardino, M.P., Litschig, S., and Pomeranz, D. (2024) ‘Distortion by audit: Evidence from public procurement’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 16(4), pp. 71–108.
Geroski, P.A. (1990) ‘Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy’, International review of applied economics, 4(2), pp. 182–198.
Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., and Yeow, J. (2013) ‘Choice, design and assessment’, Technol Forecast Soc Change, (7).
GHK (2010) ‘Evaluation of SMEs’ Access to Public Procurement Markets in the EU‘, DG Enterprise and Industry.
Holma, A.M., Østensen, M.W., Holmen, E., and de Boer, L. (2022) ‘Market dialogue in public procurement: Buyer-supplier interfaces and relational abilities’, Industrial Marketing Management, (104), pp. 51–67.
House of Lords (2011) Public Procurement as a Tool to Stimulate Innovation. Science and Technology Committee. First Report. London.
Itskovits, G. (2011) ‘The triple helix model’, Innovations, (4), pp. 5–10.
Kashin, D.V., Vilkova, M.N., Zavorokhina, A.P., Petrova, P.A., Podgorenko, Y.P., and Tillashaykhov, D.R. (2024) ‘Public procurement of innovations in Russia’, Public Administration Issues, (2), pp. 129–156. (In Russian).
Kazakova, E.D. (2012) ‘Implementation of the concept of green public procurement in the Federal Contract System of Russia’, Public Administration Issues, (3), pp. 173–187. (In Russian).
Kelly, S., Marshall, D., and Walker, H. (2021) ‘Supplier satisfaction with public sector competitive tendering processes’, Journal of Public Procurement, 21(2), pp. 183–205.
Kundu, O., Uyarra, E., Ortega-Argiles, R., Tirado, M.M., Kitsos, T., and Yuan, P.-Y. (2025) ‘Impacts of policy-driven public procurement: a methodological review’, Science and Public Policy, 52(1), pp. 50–64
McCrudden, C. (2007) ‘Buying social justice: Equality, government procurement & legal change’, OUP Oxford.
Naeini, A.B., Yazdi, N., and Maleki, A. (2024) ‘Enhancing localisation in public procurements: A framework for evaluating suppliers' capabilities’, The Extractive Industries and Society, (20), 101543.
OGC (2004) Capturing Innovation: Nurturing. Suppliers Ideas in the Public Sector.
Preuss, L. (2009) ‘Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: the case of local government’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3), pp. 213–223.
Qiao, Y., Thai, K.V., and Cummings, G. (2009) ‘State and local procurement preferences: a survey’, Journal of Public Procurement, 9(3/4), pp. 371–410.
Raj, A., Agrahari, A., and Srivastava, S.K. (2020) ‘Do pressures foster sustainable public procurement? An empirical investigation comparing developed and developing economies’, Journal of Cleaner Production, (266), 122055.
Rosell, D.T. et al. (2011) ‘Purchasing capabilities for supplier innovation in new product development’, 18th International Product Development Management Conference (IPDMC), Delft, the Netherlands, 5–7 June 2011.
Rothwell, R., and Zegveld, W. (1981) ‘Government regulations and innovation – industrial Innovation and Public Policy’, Industrial Innovation and Public Policy. Frances Pinter, pp. 116–147.
Sirotkina, N., and Lazarevich, S. (2023) ‘Electronic public procurement: case of Russia’, International Journal of Public Administration, 46(11), pp. 783–794.
Shadrina, Е., and Kashin, D. (2024) ‘What drives public procurement from SMEs?’ ECO, 54(4), pp. 110–127. (In Russian).
Shadrina, E.V., Vinogradov, D.V., and Kashin, D.V. (2022) ‘Implicit incentives in green public procurement: Good intentions versus rigid regulations’, Ecological Economics, (198), 107458.
Stojčić, N., Srhoj, S., and Coad, A. (2020) ‘Innovation procurement as capability-building: Evaluating innovation policies in eight Central and Eastern European countries’, European Economic Review, (121), 103330.
Tkachenko, A., Yakovlev, A., and Kuznetsova, A. (2017) ‘Sweet deals: State-owned enterprises, corruption and repeated contracts in public procurement’, Economic Systems, 41(1), pp. 52–67.
Treasury HM (2010) ‘Review of Competitive Dialogue NAO’, Improving the PFI tendering process. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c3932ed915d7d70d1d69
/03_ppp_competitive_dialogue.pdf. (accessed 17 September 2025).
Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., and Yeow, J. (2014) ‘Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective’, Technovation, 34(10), pp. 631–645.
Volchik, V.V., Tsygankov, S.S., Fursa, E.V., Shiryaev, I.M., and Maskaev, A.I. (2022) ‘Institutions and mechanisms of regulation of the Russian innovation system in the mirror of narratives’, Journal of Economic Regulation, 13(4), pp. 6–23.
Vinogradov, D., Shadrina, E., and Doroshenko, M. (2018) ‘KIBS for public needs’, Economia e Politica Industriale, 45(4), pp. 443–473.
Vives, X. (2008) ‘Innovation and competitive pressure’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 56 (3), pp. 419–469.
Wilkinson, R. et al. (2005) ‘public procurement for research and innovation: Expert group report: Developing procurement practices favourable to R&D and innovation’, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Yakovlev, A.A., Tkachenko, A.V., and Rodionova, Yu.D. (2017) ‘Regulation and development problems of the procurement system: comparison of customers’ and suppliers’ assessments’, Goszakaz: Management, Placement, Provision, (49). (In Russian).
Yakovlev, A., Tkachenko, A.V., Balaeva, O., and Rodionova, Yu.D. (2020) ‘Key issues and criteria for the effectiveness of the procurement system through the eyes of its participants’, Government order: management, placement, provision, (60), pp. 66–75.
Zhang, Y. (2000) ‘Using the Internet for survey research: A case study’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(1), pp. 57–68.
Copyright (c) 2025 Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
