The article considers relationship between the institutions of state control (supervision) and people who are interested in the performance of the control-supervision activity. The rights of citizens, for whom this activity is formally carried out, must be protected, in the event that authorized officials act (or do not act) in such a way that do harm to the life, health of people, their property, and the environment. According to the control-supervision relationship personsbenefi ciaries of the control-supervision activity are to take the legitimate place of third parties (persons) claiming independent requirements. The goal of the research was to find legal prerequisites and barriers for protecting the rights of third persons (parties) by pre-trial appealing, and also to raise the question on the expedience of developing the institute of pretrial appeal against decisions and actions (inaction) of the control-supervision institutions and of their officials by third parties (persons). Currently in cases of resonance extraordinary occurrences at the supervised objects, those officials of the state control, who are accused of their duties negligence, are liable to criminal persecution at the initiative of the public prosecutor’s office. Development of the pre-trial appeal institute will promote the quality rise, effectiveness of the control-supervision activity and will prevent the status qua of the organization and holding inspections from being offended and disturbed.