«Public Administration Issues» Journal,

Post. address:
National Research University
Higher School of Economics
20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation
Location address:
of. 307, 4/2, Slavyanskaya sq., Moscow 109074, Russian Federation

Tel./fax: 7 (495) 772-95-90, ext. 12631

E-mail: vgmu@hse.ru 

Science Index rating

56th place in the SCIENCE INDEX
 for 2017 (more than 5500 journals)

Russian Science Citation Index
two-year  impact factor for 2016: 1,505
(the citation  of all sources)

Russian Science Citation Index
five-year  impact factor for 2017: 1,368

Ten-year h-index 2017: 21


Journal's Indexing


Research and educational journal
Published quarterly since 2007
ISSN 1999-5431
E-ISSN 2409-5095

Alexander Kurdin 1, Andrey Shastitko  2
  • 1 PhD in Economics, Senior research fellow at the Chair of Competition Policy and Industrial Policy, Department of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Senior research fellow at the Centre for Competition and Economic Regulation Studies, RANEPA, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. 82 Vernadskogo Av., Moscow 119571, Russian Federation.
  • 2 Doctor of economic sciences, professor, director of the Center for Competition and Economic regulation research of RANEPA. Head of the chair Competition and Industrial Policy of Economic Department of Moscow State University, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy, 82 Vernadsky av., Moscow 117571, Russian Federation.

Two Arguments for a Limitation of Antitrust for IPR-related Deals in Emerging Market Economies

2017. No. 1. P. 31–49 [issue contents]
The transfer of intellectual property rights (IPR) and associated relations are subject to regular antitrust policy in the developed economies, with some minor refinements. The application of antitrust policy to the same area in the developing countries is a question of controversy. Such economies as China and Russia apply explicit exceptions for IPR-related deals in their antitrust laws.
The authors of the article consider alternative options of antitrust policy for IPRrelated deals in emerging market economies and provide rationale for weakening antitrust standards under certain conditions. This rationale is based on the goal of structural adjustment of the economy and on the prevention of undesirable growth of uncertainty affecting the choice of governance structures.

Citation: Kurdin, A.A. & Shastitko, A.E. (2017). Dva argumenta za ogranichenie antitrasta v realizatsii prav intellektual’noy sobstvennosti v razvivayushchikhsya ekonomikakh [Two Arguments for a Limitation of Antitrust for IPR-Related Deals in Emerging Market Economies]. Public Administration Issues, no 1, pp. 31–49 (in Russian).
ISSN 1999-5431
© 2009 Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления
Rambler's Top100 rss