One of the most important areas of the "regulatory guillotine" reform is the development of new regulatory structures for each sphere of public relations or type of state control (supervision). The research is based on a hypothesis about the possible desire of the authorities to preserve the current regulatory systems. The main purpose of the study is to assess the general level of the proposed regulatory structures from the point of view of their compliance with the Methodology for the implementation of the action plan ("Roadmap") for employing the mechanism of "regulatory guillotine", as well as to show the possible results and risks of their adoption in its current form in the potential improvement of control (supervision), focus on the most dangerous objects (entities) control, including in terms of whether mandatory requirements are related to potential risks of harm (damage) to protected values and sources of risk. The source of empirical data for the analysis was comprised of the drafts of new regulatory structures prepared by regulatory authorities and Supervisory authorities involved in the reform.
The study examined 73 regulatory structures prepared by 26 Federal regulatory agencies and regulatory agencies.The study made it possible to draw a conclusion about the systemic shortcomings of the new regulatory structures and suggests substantive and organizational measures to improve the quality of the developed structures.