«Public Administration Issues» Journal,

Post. address:
National Research University
Higher School of Economics
20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation
Location address:
of. 307, 4/2, Slavyanskaya sq., Moscow 109074, Russian Federation

Tel./fax: 7 (495) 772-95-90, ext. 12631

E-mail: vgmu@hse.ru 


Major Indexing

Research and educational journal
Published quarterly since 2007
ISSN 1999-5431
E-ISSN 2409-5095

Denis Manturov1
  • 1 PhD in Economics, Minister of Industry and Trade at the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation, 7 Kitaygorodsky proezd, 109074 Moscow, Russian Federation.

State Regulation in the Sphere of Industry within 25 Years. Industry in 2000–2009

2016. No. 4. P. 99–116 [issue contents]
The cycle of three articles is devoted to the analysis of industrial development management over the past 25 years. The overall purpose of the series is the evaluation of industrial regulation in the Russian Federation and setting conditions for making a new industrial development strategy of the Russian Federation. We represent the second article in this issue today. The article is about peculiarities of state regulation in the industrial sphere in the Russian Federation within the period of 2000–2009. It gives an analysis of the Russian industry condition in the 1990s and economic and legal factors that affected the choice of regulatory tools of industrial policy during this period. Industrial policy evolution in the 2000s is analyzed with taking into account the following key steps: structural adjustment policies, vertical industrial policy, and anti-crisis compensatory policy. The author assesses the «Strategy 2010» (or «Gref’s program») which is a document that made industrial policy a means of large-scale modernization of the economy, as well as Federal Targeted Programs which were the primary industrial policy implementation tools in 2004–2007. The author concludes that the adopted Federal Targeted Programs were characterized by a lack of clarity of objectives, a lack of correlation between different programs and was rather considered a way to cover expenditures than a means of industry development promotion. The article states that the manufacturing industry development in the 2000s was the result of general economic factors. It must be added that the deficiencies of industrial policy, including the imbalance and ineff ectiveness of legal support, have not been overcome in the 2000s.

Citation: Manturov, D.V. (2016). Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie v sfere promyshlennosti v techenii 25 let. Promyshlennost v 2000–2009 gg [State Regulation in the Sphere of Industry within 25 Years. Industry in 2000–2009]. Public Administration Issues, no 3, pp. 99–116 (in Russian).
ISSN 1999-5431
© 2009 Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления
Rambler's Top100 rss